Elwood
Blues
I guess I am still a bit confused at this.
I thought that I got it, that boosting the signal going into the plug in will affect the plug in, sure.
But if I understand it (big if) you are saying that after I have all the tracks mixed up close to what I want...and then if I use Ozone on the master fader, this (maybe only if the overall signal is boosted? - but Ozone almost always boosts my stuff) that that addition of Ozone (or anything that will boost the signal) will affect the "pre-fader" performance of the plug-ins?.
If that is the case I guess that even cutting the signal level at the master could "cool off" something like an OD plug in that was pre-fader?
If so the whole thing is way more touchy than I suspected. I guess yesterday I had envisioned a sort of a barrier, effects wise between pre and post fader, sounds like that is not entirely true.
I'm still sure this is how I have all of a sudden went from a pleasant sounding track to garbage and sat there clueless.
I hope that all made sense.
I thought that I got it, that boosting the signal going into the plug in will affect the plug in, sure.
But if I understand it (big if) you are saying that after I have all the tracks mixed up close to what I want...and then if I use Ozone on the master fader, this (maybe only if the overall signal is boosted? - but Ozone almost always boosts my stuff) that that addition of Ozone (or anything that will boost the signal) will affect the "pre-fader" performance of the plug-ins?.
If that is the case I guess that even cutting the signal level at the master could "cool off" something like an OD plug in that was pre-fader?
If so the whole thing is way more touchy than I suspected. I guess yesterday I had envisioned a sort of a barrier, effects wise between pre and post fader, sounds like that is not entirely true.
I'm still sure this is how I have all of a sudden went from a pleasant sounding track to garbage and sat there clueless.
I hope that all made sense.