Elio
Student Of The Blues
Just curious about scalability & flexibility of platforms like JamKazam.
On the scalability side: While I was on the Kalamazoom call, I think the highest number of participants that I saw was about 13 or 14. Did we ever get more than that?
On the flexibility side: I know that Jamkazam can support players and and "audience" (or at one time it did). 14 people all set up as players might exceed the bandwidth capabilities, but I KNOW it can support three players. If we had the ability to have three players collaborate and the rest set up as "audience" plus the ability to change individuals roles (swap people back and forth). I'm wondering if that might work.
I haven't used JK since some time last year, so I don't know if it's gotten any better or not. Thoughts?
The latest JamKazam can also live stream to FaceBook and I believe YouTube, as well as through it's own platform. That would easily allow people to just watch, versus participate. With a predefined group list and schedule, one approach might be to simply rotate players through as participants at pre-determined times while the audience watches the livestream.
...to address @artyman's concern, someone on a 32 bit O/S would be able to watch the livestream but not participate.
Last edited: